Photographing Paris

In 1992, just two years before his death, Robert Doisneau, who grew up in the Paris suburbs of Montrouge and Gentilly, and became one of Paris' most famous "street" photographers, told an interviewer that "Photographers have become suspect now" and that he didn't feel welcome on the streets anymore.

After two incidents in Paris cemeteries I think I now know how he felt.

Recently I took the no. 13 Metro to Batignolles cemetery, at the very edge of historic Paris in the 17th arr. I walked into the cemetery had strolled over to division 1 where I began taking images of the striking sculpture of Jane Margyl, the late opera singer. A few minutes later a guard approached me. Pointing to my camera said "no photos!" He stood there waiting and watching me until I shut the camera off and put it away in my bag.

This is the second cemetery where this has happened to me. I was stopped in Bercy cemetery, in the 12th arr., several weeks ago and again told I could not photograph there. I thought at the time it was just a policy particular to that cemetery.

So what's the deal I wondered?

Since I'm not from these parts and have little clue as to the intricate workings of the French bureaucracy I asked a French acquaintance about this. Well come to find out that in France it is against the law to photograph in cemeteries -- any cemetery in fact -- since the graves are considered private property. It would be like photographing people's homes, which is also prohibited. But then I got to thinking that if it is prohibited to take photos of private property then certianly that must include: automobiles and nearly all buildings and structures. . . . almost everything!

I thought how on earth can such rules be enforced in an age when even cell phones have increasingly powerful cameras? I then wondered why photography is permitted in a place like, say Pere Lachaise or Montparnasse? It is also tolerated in Montmartre and perhaps two or three other cemeteries in Paris because those places have in effect become tourist attractions. And tourists love to take pictures. Soooooo. . . .

OK, so where does that leave us photographers who struggle to capture the moment, the feeling, the mood in a cemetery?

Well, it seems to me that there at least two significant issues at stake here.

First is preservation of the history surrounding the graves themselves. A cursory glance in some of Paris' oldest cemeteries will tell you that nothing is forever, and many of the graves are in a terrible state of ruin and thefts of funerary artwork is not unknown even today. (At least nine pieces of sculpture have been stolen from Pere Lachaise within the last several montsh alone.) It is only through photography that we can hope to at least preserve what once was a wonderful work of art or a unique form of funerary architecture, and at the same time to preserve a bit of French or Parisian history as well.

And speaking of artwork, one doesn't have to look very far online to see that cemetery photography can and often does produce some stunning art. The Parisians are very tolerant of many things, most certainly when it comes to art.

For these reasons alone the French should encourage photographers to go into the cemeteries and take as many images as they would like, to spread the word that open air funerary art is worth the time and trouble to preserve. And if along the way more art comes from such imaging so much the better right?

Wish you were here,

Steve

(photo: billboard advert of the mP3 music player wars. It has absolutely nothing to do with the post; I just thought it was pretty cool.)

Free Sunday in Paris

On the first Sunday of each month many of the state-run museums in Paris are open free of charge. And for the first time in the five months since we've lived here we finally took advantage of this exceptionally imaginative deal. Yesterday dawned clear and blue and odd as it may sound, it remained that way pretty much all day. (photo: model of the Pantheon inside the Pantheon.)

It was the first day off for Susie since she started her "internship" at Pascal Pinaud's pastry shop, and so we had a leisurely morning lingering over the computer and coffee. After we showered, dressed, and grabbed our coats we walked over to the Pascal's shop where picked up one of the ever-popular Galette du Roi ("King's Cake"), a special cake for Epiphany. After we took the cake back home we turned right around and left again, for our Big Day at the Museums of Paris. Well, maybe not all of them but we were going to enjoy being out in the Parisian sunshine anyway.

First on our agenda for the day was the Pantheon which is only about a 20-minute walk from our apartment.

Orignally designed to be a grand replacement church in honor of the patron saint of Paris, Ste. Genevieve (her original church dated back to 512), the church was taken over by the revolutionary leadership in the late 18th century and turned into the final resting place for the French demi-gods (and one one demi-goddess). And so today people speak of being pantheonized, to be laid to rest in this secularly sacred place of places, although permanence has never been guaranteed, as the spirits of Mirabeau and Marat discovered, probably to their eternal chagrin.

There are virtually no windows but the light floods in and hovers right along with Foucault's pendulum. And a quick glance at the uppeer level from just the right angle shows someone had a fixation on angles.


The statuary is absolutely amazing, the paintings on the walls like tapesteries, and this is just the main level.


One descends to the crypt from the rear of the building and there is Rousseau and Voltaire. As you enter further into the recesses of the crypt you find many others whose names resound throughout much of western civilization: Victor Hugo, Alexandre Dumas and Emile Zola all rest in the same small vault together (an interesting threesome to be sure).


Pierre Curie and his wife Marie rest one on top of the other (Marie is on top if you must know). We had no idea that Marie, who was born in Warsaw, won not one but two Nobel prizes: in 1903 she shared the Physics prize with her husband and then in 1913 won the Chemistry prize for her work in radioactivity.

From the Pantheon we strolled down a side street, away from the general tourist drift toward the Jardin du Luxembourg, and hopped on the no. 10 Metro at Mabillon, switched trains at Duroc onto the no. 13 and then got off at the Invalides. Our hope was to see the newly remodeled World Wars 1 and 2 galleries but for some odd reason (probably because this is the army and the army is, well a bureaucracy) they don't participate in the "Free sunday" rule so we moved on.

We strolled across the Pont Alexandre III bridge, certainly one of the most beautiful bridges in the city, crossed over to the right bank (you could feel a chill in the air now) and then turned to our right and headed toward the Tuileries.

Our next objective was to see Claude Monet's les Nympheas (Water Lilies) at the Musee d'Orangerie, and boy were we in for a surprise.

Outside one will often find a line of art-minded folks waiting to get in and today, being a free day, was no exception. The exterior appearance of the museum belies its interior spaces and it is an impressive collection of galleries. (There's even an exposition of a bit of of the original wall of Paris included on the lower level.)

The Lilies, which gave Giverny everlasting fame, are certainly impressive from the sheer scale of these paintings: they run anywhere from 860 cm to 1700 cm (or roughly 9 yards to more than 18 yards) in length and are over 200 cm (2 yards) in height. However, their subdued and muted colors didn't appeal to me and frankly I thought it was so much wasted canvas. We both thought they were, well, boring. On the lower level however it was a much different picture (no pun intended).




The lower level galleries were jam packed with works by Renoir, Matisse, Picasso, and numerous other Big Names. We particularly liked the Renoirs, his images were evocative of tenderness and feelings which registered with both of us. And we also liked the present temporary exposition of realist painters such as Georges de la Tour (with thought his work simply stunning). Fascinating work, worth some of your time.

From the Orangerie we strolled through the Tuileries, past the Place du Carrousel, crossing the ground that once held the famed Tuileries palace, burned by revolutionaries who thought it stood in the way of progress. And so it probably did. Passing through the Louvre, or rather around the pyramids, we eventually wended our way out to Rue de Rivoli and walked up to the Pompidou Centre. (photos: exterior, and interior of, well the exterior!)



I must admit right up front that I like this building. I must also be frank and say right up front that much of what lies within, at least on the top two or three floors, is, well, crap. But hey one can't have everything.

The good news was that the line moved fast to get inside where we found ourselves confronted with a cacophony of sound, color and confusion as to which direction to go and how to get there. Fortunately there was an information booth nearby which seemed to be directing everyone to another huge line waiting to go somewhere but we couldn't for the life of us figure out where that was. So we went off on our own and eventually found our way to the interior-exterior escalators to take us to the top level of the Centre and discovered we had some striking views of the city.(photos: Sacre Coeur and Montmartre and Eiffel tower.)



Besides having fantastic views the Pomidou is also the acme of modern art museums. I like modern art museums for the simple reason it is so very easy to move from gallery to gallery.

Let me explain.

Say you're in the Vatican museum and are a serious art-minded kind of person. You are faced with an overhwleming amount of 2- and 3-dimensional things to look at, ponder over, stand in front of and contemplate the colors, the angles, the shapes, trying to piece together the ideas that wen into that creation, the things that determined such a complex piece of sculpture or oil painting. So much to see, so much to think about it makes one's head ache just to talk about it.

Not so with modern art. There's little worry over having to think too long or too hard about it.

For example, on level 4 of the Pompidou you can find yourself in a room where the artist (dare I use such a hackneyed word for this person?) actually took stamped envelopes, framed them and then said "Hey, over here, this is art!" And someone else, equally well-educated probably, said "By Golly you're right, so it is! I'll give you some money for that!" As you peek in you can see that hey these are just framed envelopes. Well that's crap! It's time to move on!


Or you walk into a room that has nothing in it except a bunch of green household stuff strewn about the floor (probably laid out in a very dfeliberate manner I'm sure). More crap! It's time to move on!


Or how about the man (or woman since today women can be equally preposterous) who set up a projector, with no film in it, pointed it at a blank black wall, turned it on and then left it running apparently forever, with just static as an image. Oh boy still more crap! It's time to move on!


Or how about a never-ending loop of a movie where all you see is a grainy black and white image of a man's hand is forever trying to catch something being dropped onto it, or another black and white "movie" where a man sitting outside is trying to write with a fountain pen while he is being doused with a constant stream of water, or another one where a camera slowly pans up and down steps.

Whew! Intense?

Apparently so since there seemed to be a never ending stream of persons just sitting, watching these "moving images" as if riveted to their seats. I asked Susan later "What do you suppose those people are thinking about as they watch this?" Her response was that some probably get high before they come to the Pompidou and then just sit back and drift onto another plane of existence altogether, leaving the rest of us behind to fend off reality on our own.

Probably so.

But see how easy modern art is on the mind and eye?

Well we could only take so much of this so we found our way outside and then crossed over to the little Brancusi museum just next door. Constantin Brancus was born in Rumania but eventually settled in Paris. His sculpture studio was in Montparnasse and upon his death he willed his entire studio and collection of work to the state on the condition that they recreate his studio just as it was on the day he died. And so they did. Drop by for a look at how one of the early 20th century "French" sculptors lived and worked, joined occasionally by friends such as Erik Satie. (And one of his pieces, a couple hugging, sits over a grave in a quiet, out-of-the wasy corner of division 19 in Montparnasse cemetery.)

The one thing that left me moved more than anything else by the day was that I had the opportunity to see first hand today the work of artists whose gravesites I had already visited : Brancusi and Chaim Soutine (Montparnasse), Marie Laurencin (Pere Lachaise) Maurice Utrillio (St. Vincent). I felt my education continue moment-by-moment.

After Susie and I left the Pompidou we strolled down to the Hotel de Ville and checked out the ice rink set up in front of the city hall. And I saw another first: a double-decker carrousel, loaded with kids and, curiously, lots of adults. Now that's art.


Wish you could have been here,

Steve

President Ford

A brief, very brief diversion for a moment, please.

With the passing of President Ford there has been much talk about his decency, integrity, honesty, words rarely mentioned in the same sentence with a politician's name these days. I never knew the president of course but from what one can tell from the man's actions it seemed such qualities were probably not far off the mark.

So I suppose it comes as no surprise to see that many folks are eager to repeat the late president's opinions of his peers as well as his thoughts and observations about the state of the presidency today.

The Grand Rapids Press, his "hometown" newspaper, apparently had frequent access to president over the years and has now reprinted excerpts of his comments about the former presidents he knew. Mike Lloyd, editor of the Press reported in the article that Ford didn't know George II so he couldn't comment on him.

(Click here for the article.)

Hmmmmm. Maybe he could comment after all. According to Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, in a recent interview held in Colorado, Ford was more than willing to comment on the policies of the present administration as well as some of the key players themselves. And it's a sobering picture indeed.

(Click here for the article.)

Just a Paris pastry shop - updated 6/5/2014

Susan went off to her first day at Pascal Pinaud's pastry shop on rue Monge early this morning (Friday) and frankly she was a bit nervous (OK pretty nervous). But just think about it: today is the first time since since her college days that she was going off to work in a place that didn't require any knowledge of anatomy, only a commitment to making something that people would buy to savor later that day. Naturally, then, for the past several days she's been like a cat, just waiting for something to happen. And now it has.

At a little before 6 a.m. she went off in the dark and quiet of an early Paris morning for the 10 minute-walk to the pastry shop, which she found equally dark and quiet and locked tight. Soon after she left I received a call from her asking for the phone number of the shop and then she called back a few minutes later saying there was no answer and that she was just standing out front waiting for someone, somewhere to let her in. She did report, however, that there were quite a few people setting up for the daily market -- the pastry shop sits right off of Place Monge and Friday is one of the big market days -- so at least she wasn't alone in the dark.

Well while we were chatting or rather Susie was filling me in on the market, along came a guy delivering sugar to the pastry shop so she decided to just follow him in and see what happens. More to follow later today.

21:20 (9:20 p.m. for nonmilitary types). We've just returned from a celebratory meal out at Cafe des Isles, the sister restaurant to Coco de Mer where we ate some months back. Both are in our neighborhood (the Cafe is on rue Monge and Coco is on Rue Saint Marcel) and both provide a wonderful gastronomic eye on the Seychelles ( off the northern coast of Madagascar). Outstanding seafood (fresh snapper from the Seychelles), very nice staff and reasonable prices; very highly recommended.

And why the celebration? Susan just finished her first (12 hour) shift in a Paris pastry shop of course! In general she walked away from the day with a very good feeling about both the people she is working with and the things she had to do.

Like what?

Well she had to make pastry cream to fill eclairs (which she also had to help do) and then pastry cream for a flan. (The cream fillings called for 6 liters of milk, 1500 grams of sugar, 36 egg yolks along with the flour etc. Now we're talking pastry cream.) After that she made chocolate ganache (cream and chocolate), then she helped work on bread doughs, topped chestnut barquettes (short pastry crust with an almond cream filling baked and then topped with chestnut cream which has to be formed into a specific smooth shape on the top), helped to make baguette sandwiches. At about 2:30 they stopped for a break and one of her co-workers (there are two other women working there, both from Japan, and of course Pascal) made noodles with salmon for lunch. It was then back to work! She also did her share of dishes as well.

At about 7 pm she left and walked home. A good day for her all around and one that was important to put behind her. She now has a sense of what is expected of her and what she will likely learn over the coming weeks and months. And she's working with some very nice people whose goal is to make very good food. What more could a pastry chef ask for?

Wish you were here,

Steve

Paris New Year

Paris was quiet this New Year’s – or rather it was for us at any rate. After a scrumptious meal at home early in the evening, followed by watching Saving Private Ryan, we were planning on grabbing our bottle of champagne, camera and heading out for the Eiffel tower an hour or so before midnight.

Well the weather continued lousy all day, with rain off and on into the evening. We were considering alternatives such as taking the Metro to the Pont Neuf Bridge and watching the fireworks from there. (We weren’t terribly worried about our monthly Metro passes expiring at midnight since all city transportation was free all night long.)

For reasons that still remain unclear to me even now, about 10:30 or so last evening I started looking online for information about the fireworks display and would you believe I came across blog entries and forum discussions claiming that there were no fireworks planned in Paris! In fact, come to find out later in the evening that fireworks are banned in the city. They had a big blow-off a couple of years back when the city made a play for the 2012 Olympics and of course back in 1999-2000. That’s it. (photo: Pont de Sully, I believe.)

Well the pieces of the puzzle were falling into place: bad weather, no fireworks, so we opted to stay home, and take our champagne out on the balcony and toast the New Year. Which is exactly what we did. And good thing too since we were also able to catch the Global Edition of "the Daily Show with Jon Stewart" at 11:30 p.m. . . .

Like many others we slept in New Year’s Day – and were greeted by a gorgeous blue sky and such sun as we hadn’t seen since we were in Strasbourg. What a grand way to begin the New Year, we thought, and after being apartment-bound for a week or more, what a day to grab our coats and head out for a walk. So we did. We strolled up to the Jardin des Plantes where we cut through to the Seine and then strolled along the Seine to Notre Dame, basking in the sun along with tens of thousands of other like-minded folks.

From Notre Dame we walked to the downstream end of the Ile de la Cite, to the Pont Neuf, and crossed to the right bank where we soon found a place to have a bite of lunch. We parked ourselves by a sun-filled window and watched humanity strolling by us along the river.

After lunch we walked through the Louvre, or rather through the grounds since the museum was closed. As we entered our the Tuileries my eye caught sight of the underground entrance to the Carrousel du Louvre , the large underground mall complex right beneath the Louvre and Tuileries. Since we had never been there before we thought now is as good a time as any to check this place out so down we went.

Two things struck me when we came to the bottom of the wide staircase: how new everything seemed to be and part of an old wall system – that’s right they have dug out some of the original 14-16th century walls and exposed them for the casual passerby. (And gives you a good idea of how built up the area is today.) As we walked down one of the numerous passageways we came out into a large atrium open to the sky with passages and shops radiating out in several different directions. There are numerous legitimate theaters, stores, restaurants, underground parking, you name it it’s probably down there. Oh, and wonderful public restrooms.


After we surfaced we walked to the end of the Tuileries and my eye (again) caught sight of something off to the river side of the garden, something I had not noticed before. In a city which seems to revel in playing tricks on the eyes of the casual observer, in a city filled with artwork virtually on every street corner, I was nonetheless surprised to see something I couldn’t believe: a large tree that had apparently fallen on its side. But something just didn’t look right. And as we approached it for a closer look everything fell into place. It was in fact not made out of wood but out of metal; it was yet another piece of art.


Seeing this, almost exactly five months to the day after we arrived in the city of light, it just seemed to define for me anyway, everything that is Paris: quirkiness, whimsy, and yet serious artwork, of course, but also imagination at work everywhere here, sometimes so much that you can almost hear it humming on the streets. It was just about this time that I heard Susan say to me I suppose but seemingly to no one in particular, “This city is really cool.” That pretty much summarizes it for me too. This place is tres cool.

Granted, it’s not home, it’s not where we are from, it’s not where our friends or families live, all that is true. But I think it is clear now that we will miss this city after we’re gone.

Happy New Year, bonne annee and buon capodanno to you all!

Wish you were here,

Steve

Family gathering in Manistee

We hadn't been home two weeks from our trip visiting family in New England before we were back on the road again, this time catching up ...